Dr. Sid T. Womack's ATU Home Page


Office: Crabaugh 211
(479) 968-0423
Fax: (479) 964-0811


Summer 1 2015 office hours:

9 - 11 Mondays through Friday. I am typically in the office much more than these official office hours. Most days, drop-in visits are acceptable.

Sid Womack at 22

Sid Womack at 22 entering a career as a band director, full of idealism and short of experience.


Sid Womack circa 2005

The professor some 6,000 college students knew, in the classroom at Arkansas Tech where he did the majority of his teaching. Photo circa 2002.

Womack presents at MSERA


Teacher/researcher/leader during a a presentation at the 2011 meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association in Oxford, Mississippi.


Helpful Links

SEED2001/2 news
MLED3062 news
MLED3072 news
ECED3053 news
SEED3554 news
SEED4052 news
SEED4503 news
SEED4809 news
SPED5013 news
SPED5023 news
EDFD6003 news
EDFD6043 news
EDFD6053 news
EDFD6313 news
ELED6803 news
ELED6823 news
EDFD6993 news
MAEC6163 news



I had an enjoyable career in education for 43 years. In 34 years of teacher education, I helped to prepare enough teachers and administrators to minister to well over one million children. I encouraged and gave technical assistance to more than a dozen people who are walking around today with their Ed. D.s or Ph.D.s. Today I am giving of myself mainly through the Dover church of Christ. I enjoy hobbies such as gardening, archery, and hunting.

Teacher evaluation has come a very long way since the 1970s. For a seemingly endless amount of time most teacher evaluation forms centered in one way or the other around the likeability issue. By the end of the 1990s, the research was showing that assessing teachers on how likeable they were was a path leading to nowhere. There were too many teachers that were well liked but whose students couldn't do anything.

Teachers, most of them, are reasonably intelligent people. When they looked at the evaluation forms and saw that success had nothing to do with student learning but everything about being well-heeled and well-liked, they put away any kind of negative feedback to students and concentrated on becoming the "host with the most.".

Since the NCATE redesign of 2000, teacher evaluation has centered on how much students learned instead of how personable or likeable teachers are. If what we want students to do is learn -- not just be well entertained -- we need teachers who will focus in that direction.

Likeabililty and efficacy (the ability to get students to learn) are barely correlated. They're not negatively correlated and there is no reason for a teacher to become as obnoxious as possible in order to get students to learn. But being liked cannot become the goal for a teacher. Getting students to learn is the real job. Occasionally that means telling students that they did not perform well on the last assignment or test. It may mean telling them they need to try harder. That's not the favorite part of the job for any teacher and it wasn't for me.

The challenge of teaching is to be the teacher one's students will like 5, 10, 20 years later in life . . . not necessarily who they like at the moment. We teach for the future, not for the present.

If effectiveness is the test of the teacher, I feel like I passed that test during my 34 years in teacher education. It was a very rare occasion that any student did not pass the parts of the Praxis that I was responsible for communicating. The times when my former students showed the most affection to me was when they had been teaching long enough to try out the ideas that I had given them.

A student who I had had in fourth grade looked me up on the Internet and thanked me for being his teacher -- 35 years later! Those are the moments teachers live for.

  • Interested in my professional background? Please see my vita for more details.

[Tech Home] [SiteMap] [Search]

Copyright Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, Arkansas.
All trademarks herein belong to their respective owners.

This is the professional web site of an Arkansas Tech University faculty member. The university supports academic freedom. While these pages do not in any way constitute official Arkansas Tech University content, we hope you find the information in them useful. Tech does not actively monitor or generally restrict the materials published on these sites; the views and opinions expressed in the pages are strictly those of the author. Any issues with the contents of the pages should be directed to the author.